Library Supervision as a Component of Scientific and Practical Relations between the Library and the Scientist: Current State
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15802/unilib/2019_187407Keywords:
Library, faculties, collaboration, scientific interaction, information literacyAbstract
Objective. Library supervision over faculties is a new direction of work, which is being implemented by university libraries in different countries. The work is aimed to study the world and domestic experience of university libraries in the direction of library supervision as a component of scientific and practical relations between the library and the scientist. Methods. The research was conducted on the basis of the analysis of the world literary flow in library information science. The Ukrainian experience is analyzed on the example of implementation of the Library Supervisory Program of the Central Scientific Library of V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University (CSL KhNU) within the framework of implementation of the University and Library Development Strategy. Results. The most topical issues of concern to the world library community were analyzed: the purpose and options of the librarian-lecturer interaction, the contradictions in the relationship between librarians and scholars, the librarian and information literacy training. The main elements of the Library Supervisory Program of the CSL KhNU are the expanded informing of the representatives of the faculties on the CSL`s possibilities and various forms of individual and group consultations of readers, deepening of inter-organizational interaction. Conclusions. The process of interaction between librarians and higher education departments in the early 21st century, in the context of a holistic and very rapid development of the information society, is urgent and necessary. Given the rational and competent implementation of its basic conditions, which have already been worked out on the basis of foreign experience, it has great potential.
References
American Library Association. (2000). Information Literacy Competency Standards for Higher Education. Chicago, Illinois. Retrieved from https://alair.ala.org/bitstream/handle/11213/7668/ACRL%20Information%20Literacy%20Competency%20Standards%20for%20Higher%20Education.pdf?sequence=1yisAllowed=y
Bendriss, R., Saliba, R., & Birch, S. (2015). Faculty and Librarians’ Partnership: Designing a New Framework to Develop Information Fluent Future Doctors. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 41(6), 821-838. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2015.09.003
Braddlee, & VanScoy, A. (2019). Bridging the Chasm: Faculty Support Roles for Academic Librarians in the Adoption of Open Educational Resources. College & Research Libraries, 80(4), 426-449. doi: https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.80.4.426
Campbell, M. (2010). Collaborations between Librarians and Faculty in a Digital Age. Education Digest: Essential Readings Condensed for Quick Review, 75, 30-33. Retriеved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/234749324_Collaborations_between_Librarians_and_Faculty_in_a_Digital_Age
Davids, Z., & Omar, Y. (2018). Implementing a Certificate of Information Literacy programme and engaging with faculty: a case study of the Cape Peninsula University of Technology. South African Journal of Libraries and Information Science, 84(1), 1-10. doi: https://doi.org/10.7553/84-1-1716
Dobozy, E., & Gross, J. (2010). Pushing Library Information to First-Year Students: An Exploratory Study of Faculty/Library Collaboration. Australian Academic & Research Libraries, 41(2), 90-99. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00048623.2010.10721447
Ivey, R. (2003). Information literacy: how do librarians and academics work in partnership to deliver effective learning programs? Australian Academic & Research Libraries, 34(2), 100-113. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00048623.2003.10755225
Lewis, D. W. (2007). A strategy for ademic libraries in the first quarter of the 21st century. College & Research Libraries, 68(5), 418-434. doi: https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.68.5.418
McNee, D., & Radmer, E. (2017). Librarians and Learning: the Impact of Collaboration. English Leadership Quarterly, August, 6-9. Retrieved from http://www.ncte.org/library/NCTEFiles/Resources/Journals/ELQ/0401-aug2017/ELQ0401Librarians.pdf
Nikitina, О. V., & Mats, L. V. (2012). Proekt «Kurator»: novyiy podhod v menedzhmente bibliotek: (opyit vnedreniya elektronnyih bibliotechnyih sistem). Izvestiya Sankt-Peterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo ekonomicheskogo universiteta, 5, 147-150. Retrieved from https://cyberleninka.ru/article/v/proekt-kurator-novyy-podhod-v-menedzhmente-biblioteki-opyt-vnedreniya-elektronnyh-bibliotechnyh-sistem (in Russian)
Scripps-Hoekstra, L., & Hamilton, E. R. (2016). Back to the Future: Prospects for Education Faculty and Librarian Collaboration Thirty Years Later. Education Libraries, 39(1). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.26443/el.v39i1.10
Yu, T., Chen, C. C., Khoo, C., Butdisuwan, S., Ma, L., Sacchanand, C., & Tuamsuk, K. (2019). Faculty-librarian collaborative culture in the universities of Hong Kong, Singapore, Taiwan, and Thailand: A comparative study. Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science, 24(1), 97-121. doi: https://doi.org/10.22452/mjlis.vol24no1.6
Wishkoski, R., Lundstrom, K., & Davis, E. (2018). Librarians in the Lead: A Case for Interdisciplinary Faculty: Collaboration on Assignment Design. Communications in Information Literacy, 12(2), 166-192. doi: https://doi.org/10.15760/comminfolit.2018.12.2.7
