DOI: https://doi.org/10.15802/unilib/2020_220676

FEATURES OF THE EDUCATIONAL PROCESS IN THE INFORMATION AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS SOCIETY

Olha V. TURMYS

Abstract


Objective. The purpose of this paper is to analyze the impact of the development of information and communication technologies in society on the state of the educational process. In the study we applied such Methods as analysis of scientific materials, data processing and modelling of future educational process. Eventually we came to the Results that educational process is being in close correlation with the Web-technologies and telecommunications society, it is dynamically changing according to the current state of information environment. In Conclusions we summed up all the material and made prognosis for the members of educational process due to the positive and negative factors of effecting informatization on the educational process.


Keywords


information literacy; learning process; university library; millennials; information society

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bennett, S., & Maton, K. (2010). Beyond the ‘digital natives’ debate: Towards a more nuanced understanding of students’ technology experiences. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26(5), 321-331. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2010.00360.x (in English)

Bennett, S., Maton, K., & Kervin, L. (2008). The 'digital natives' debate: A critical review of the evidence. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(5), 775-786. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00793.x (in English)

Buckingham, D. & Willett, R. (Eds.). (2006). Digital Generations: Children,Young People and New Media. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. doi: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203810668 (in English)

Castells, M. (2000). The rise of the network society (2nd ed.). Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishers. (in English)

Castells, M. (2001). The Internet galaxy: Reflections on the internet, business, and society. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. (in English)

Hargittai, E. (2010). Digital Na(t)ives? Variation in Internet Skills and Uses among Members of the ‘‘Net Generation’’. Sociological Inquiry, 80(1), 92-113. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-682X.2009.00317.x (in English)

Jones, C., Ramanau, R., Cross, S., & Healing, G. (2010). Net generation or digital natives: Is there a distinct new generation entering university? Computers and Education, 24(3), 722-732. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.09.022 (in English)

Kennedy, G., Judd, T.S., Churchward, A., Gray, K., & Krause, K. (2008). First year students' experiences with technology: Are they really digital natives? ‘Questioning the net generation: A collaborative project in Australian higher education’. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 24(1), 108-122. Retrieved from http://www.ascilite.org.au/ajet/ajet24/kennedy.html (in English)

Lisetti, C. (1999). A User-Model of Cognition-Emotion. Proceedings of the UserModelling First Workshop on Attitude, Personality, and Emotions in User-Adapted Interaction, 25-35. (in English)

Picard, R. W. (1997). Affective Computing. Cambridge, MA: M.I.T. Press. (in English)

Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1-6. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/10748120110424816 (in English)

Prensky, M. (2009). H. sapiens digital: From digital immigrants and digital natives to digital wisdom. Innovate, 5(3). Retrieved from https://nsuworks.nova.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1020&context=innovate (in English)

Weller, M. (2007). Virtual Learning Environments: Using choosing and developing your VLE. Oxford, UK: Routledge. (in English)


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.