How’s Our Library E-Service? Measuring User Satisfaction in the Virtual Environment

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15802/unilib/2022_270170

Keywords:

user satisfaction, virtual library service, service quality, Quality of Service (QoS), Nazarbayev University, Kazakhstan

Abstract

Objective. This study aims to determine the satisfaction with the virtual reference service of library users of Nazarbayev University Library during the Spring 2021 to Spring 2022 semesters. Methods. This study employed a descriptive approached to determine the satisfaction of users with the virtual service of Nazarbayev University Library during the Spring 2021 to Spring 2022 semesters. Using the data gathered from LibAnswers’ Quality of Service (QoS), this study examines various metrics in answering the queries received both in synchronous (chat service) or asynchronous (email service) virtual service. Statistical data from were tabulated and analyzed and the feedback from patrons will be interpreted using Voyant Tools, a web-based data visualization software. Results. The study describe how patrons were satisfied with the virtual library service of NU Library as perceived through their feedback and their overall experience of the service. In addition, the study pointed out that the Library considers all virtual transactions urgent and put the satisfaction of their patrons on top priority based on the metrics. Conclusions. The study revealed that patrons were satisfied with the virtual service rendered by NU Library both in synchronous and asynchronous format. With the help of the metrics generated from LibAnswers Quality of Service (QoS) feature, the NU Library was able to provide an excellent service despite the limitations brought by the pandemic. The feedback from patrons was indeed a proof of their satisfaction. As service quality and user satisfaction will always go together, the library, as a service-oriented information arm of any institution, should always put their patrons as their top priority.

Author Biography

A. R. MANABAT, Nazarbayev University Library (Astana, Kazakhstan)


April Manabat,
Senior Expert Librarian

References

Adeniran, P. (2011). User satisfaction with academic libraries services: Academic staff and students perspectives. International Journal of Library and Information Science, 3(10), 209-216. doi: https://doi.org/10.5897/IJLIS11.045 (in English)

Ahmad, H., & Allan, M. (2014). Customer satisfaction. Universiti Utara Malaysia. Retrieved from https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.ezproxy.nu.edu.kz/lib/astana/detail.action?docID=6766392 (in English)

Breeding, M. (2021, Jan. 27). Springshare: Measuring user satisfaction with LibAnswers. Library Technology Guides. Retrieved from https://librarytechnology.org/pr/25868 (in English)

Cook, C., Heath, F., Thompson, B., & Webster, D. (2003). LibQUAL+TM: Preliminary results from 2002. Performance Measurement and Metrics, 4(1), 38-47. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/14678040310471239 (in English)

Customer satisfaction. (2011). In J. Law. Business: the ultimate resource (3rd ed.). United Kingdom: A&C Black (in English)

Dahan, S. M., Taib, M. Y., Zainudin, N. M., & Ismail, F. (2016). Surveying users’ perception of academic library services quality: A case study in university Malaysia Pahang (UMP) library. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 42(1), 38-43. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2015.10.006 (in English)

Gathoni, N., & Van der Walt, T. (2019). Evaluating library service quality at the Aga Khan University library: Application of a total quality management approach. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 51(1), 123-136. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0961000616679725 (in English)

Kiran, K. (2010). Service quality and customer satisfaction in academic libraries: Perspectives from a Malaysian university. Library Review, 59(4), 261-273. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/00242531011038578 (in English)

Martensen, A., & Grønholdt, L. (2003). Improving library users’ perceived quality, satisfaction and loyalty: an integrated measurement and management system. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 29(3), 140-147. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-1333(03)00020-X (in English)

Nitecki, D. A. (1996). Changing the concept and measure of service quality in academic libraries. The journal of academic librarianship, 22(3), 181-190. Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/7086644/Changing_the_concept_and_measure_of_service_quality_in_academic_libraries (in English)

Nitecki, D. A., & Hernon, P. (2000). Measuring service quality at Yale University’s Libraries. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 26(4), 259-273. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-1333(00)00117-8 (in English)

Oliveira, S. M., & Greenidge, N. (2020). Information seeking behavior of distance learners: What has changed in twenty years? Journal of Library & Information Services in Distance Learning, 14(1), 2-27. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/1533290X.2020.1791301 (in English)

Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1988). SERVQUAL: A multiple-item Scale for measuring consumer perception of service quality. Journal of Retailing, 64(1), 12-40. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/225083802_SERVQUAL_A_multiple-_Item_Scale_for_measuring_consumer_perceptions_of_service_quality (in English)

Pedramnia, S., Modiramani, P., & Ghavami Ghanbarabadi, V. (2012). An analysis of service quality in academic libraries using LibQUAL scale: Application oriented approach, a case study in Mashhad University of Medical Sciences (MUMS) libraries. Library Management, 33(3), 159-167. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/01435121211217144 (in English)

Cristobal, A. S. (2018). Expectations on library services, library quality (LibQual) dimension and library customer satisfaction: Relationship to customer loyalty. Library Philosophy and Practice. 1706. Retrieved from https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/1706 (in English)

Sinclair, S., & G. Rockwell. (2022). Bubbles. Voyant Tools. Retrieved September 1, 2022. Retrieved from https://voyant-tools.org/?corpus=576d1f7bc248006ea2b35029a8389557&view=Bubbles (in English)

Sinclair, S., & G. Rockwell. (2022). Bubbles. Voyant Tools. Retrieved September 1, 2022. Retrieved from https://voyant-tools.org/?corpus=70f20abe5258ae40da6ec34799aa0601&view=Bubbles (in English)

Sinclair, S., & G. Rockwell. (2022). Cirrus. Voyant Tools. Retrieved September 1, 2022. Retrieved from https://voyant-tools.org/?visible=105&corpus=576d1f7bc248006ea2b35029a8389557&view=Cirrus (in English)

Sinclair, S., & G. Rockwell. (2022). Cirrus. Voyant Tools. Retrieved September 1, 2022. Retrieved from https://voyant-tools.org/?visible=95&corpus=70f20abe5258ae40da6ec34799aa0601&view=Cirrus (in English)

Sinclair, S., & G. Rockwell. (2022). Links. Voyant Tools. Retrieved September 1, 2022. Retrieved from https://voyant-tools.org/?query=helpful&query=thank&query=quick&mode=corpus&corpus=576d1f7bc248006ea2b35029a8389557&view=CollocatesGraph (in English)

Sinclair, S., & G. Rockwell. (2022). Links. Voyant Tools. Retrieved September 1, 2022. Retrieved from https://voyant-tools.org/?query=thank&query=service&query=library&mode=corpus&corpus=70f20abe5258ae40da6ec34799aa0601&view=CollocatesGraph (in English)

Smith, A. M. (1995). Measuring Service Quality: is SERVQUAL now Redundant? Journal of Marketing Management, 11(1-3), 257-276. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.1995.9964341 (in English)

SpringShare. (2021). LibAnswers statistics: Quality of Service statistics for tickets & chats [web-site]. Retrieved from https://ask.springshare.com/libanswers/faq/2856 (in English)

Twum, K. K., Adams, M., Budu, S., & Budu, R. A. A. (2022). Achieving university libraries user loyalty through user satisfaction: the role of service quality. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 32(1), 54-72. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/08841241.2020.1825030 (in English)

Vogus, B. (2020). Examining virtual reference services in academic libraries. Public Services Quarterly, 16(4), 249-253. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/15228959.2020.1818664 (in English)

Wang, I.-M., & Shieh, C.-J. (2006). The relationship between service quality and customer satisfaction: the example of CJCU library. Journal of Information & Optimization Sciences, 27(1), 193-209. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/02522667.2006.10699686 (in English)

Yap, J. M., & Manabat, A. R. (2021). Are we in-sync? Students’ virtual instructional experience and perceived information literacy skills in time of pandemic. Internet Reference Services Quarterly, 25(4), 169-184. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10875301.2021.1988796 (in English)

Downloads

Published

2022-12-30

How to Cite

MANABAT, A. R. (2022). How’s Our Library E-Service? Measuring User Satisfaction in the Virtual Environment. University Library at a New Stage of Social Communications Development. Conference Proceedings, (7), 110–126. https://doi.org/10.15802/unilib/2022_270170

Issue

Section

LIBRARY SERVICES FOR SCIENCE AND EDUCATION SUPPORT